I have been talking about the Gold/Oil Ratio since February. I called for 1% interest rates and sub 2% Treasury yields (I meant 2 Year Treasuries, I thought that was implied). Although I was not very knowledgeable about gold then, I’ve had a lot of time to learn. That’s besides the fact that I called 2 key trends 9 months before they happened. I got the call on Oil despite the fact that it rallied 50% because I never called a sell.

Here is a historical look at the Gold/Oil ratio again:

Historical Oil vs Gold

Historical Oil vs Gold

Brad Zigler of Hard Asset Investors analyzed recent activity and made a bullish case for gold and a negative one for oil.

Even more interesting is the fact that the Gold/Oil ratio closed at 15 on Thursday and 16 on Friday. Could we really begin to see 30 multiples again? Zigler and I both say yes. But how will this play out?

I once thought we would see both expensive gold and oil. However, recently it looks like we will see a high multiple of the Gold/Oil ratio due to cheap oil and above $1,000 gold. With Oil trending to $30, that would mean a gold oil ratio of 33! A reversion to the mean of 15 could then take place through an oil rally rather then a gold plunge. Where as before I was bullish on gold and oil, now I am only bullish on gold.

Posted by cmonterroza, filed under Uncategorized. Date: November 22, 2008, 5:47 pm | No Comments »

To call “The Great Depression Part 2″ half a year before the media and government took action has been a highlight of my blog.

I called for government nationalizations in February. At the time, I had a chance to ask Jim Cramer what he thought about Fannie and Freddie. He actually said to go long both. I almost laughed after hearing the response. As a matter of fact, I was harping on nationalizations before Bear Stearns.

On interest rates, I called for 1% Fed Funds rate before summer end in February. Although I got the timing about one and a half months off, I was calling for rate cuts before the Fed Funds went below the rate of inflation. No one thought this was possible.

On currencies, I called the rise of the Yen before people were thinking about about the Eurozone slashing rates.

On the equity markets, I accurately called a market bottom on March 7th on March 6th as the market tip toed with 12,000. I also said that the next time the market touch 12,000, it would crash through.
On Apple (AAPL), I called its agressive move into gaming and sky rocketing sales. However, I have been short the stock understanding that technical reasons are more important in today’s market.

How did I see so much coming? It is important that everyone who invests develop an investment thesis.

If you look at all of the above predictions came from correctly gauging the gravity of the crisis and government intervention. I presented plenty of evidence on why this crisis was unprecedented and global in nature. Bernanke is a student of the Great Depression. He has written about how absurdly far he would be willing to intervene in order to avoid a Great Depression. With a maniac at the helm, you expect drastic action. That means 1% interest rates and government nationalization. That means reversal of carry trades, international cooperation, and most of all deleveraging. Where positive and negative aspects of the thesis interact it is important to determine the dominant factor to gague the dominant trend.

Posted by cmonterroza, filed under Uncategorized. Date: November 17, 2008, 2:00 pm | 1 Comment »

Here is the last post I wrote before taking the two month break from the Blog. I did not post it, but as a way of getting back into the fray, here it is.

I have previously claimed that it was me who brought Non Borrowed Reserves to the attention of Wall Street with my Monterroza Research blog. I will admit that I had help from Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis who introduced me to Net Free of Borrowed Reserves, but I was pointing out how much non-borrowed cash banks had in their accounts. So I looked for the number and found that the trend was was literally off the charts. Immediately after my first blog post Wall Street began it’s offensive to dismiss the number as irrelevant and as the writer as a conspiracy theorist. Unfortunately for them, the number is neither irrelevant and the writer was an accounting major, economics minor and investor. Shortly after, there was an announcement that the Bush administration was shutting down a website that aggregates major sources of economic indicators from many federal websites. I thought nothing of it at the time but I thought that the reason for shutting down the website was ridiculously idiotic: the website was shut down due to budgetary constraints. However, when I went back to check my favorite data series, Non Borrowed Reserves, I was startled at what I found: the series was altered.

If you check the Fed of St. Louis website right now what you will see is a series entitled Total Non Borrowed Reserves and Term Auction Funds. What is amazing is that the two phrases, “Non Borrowed Reserves” and “Term Auction Funds” are a conundrum when put together. Non Borrowed Reserves are just that non borrowed, while the TAF loans are temporary loans that were invented three months ago. Non Borrowed Reserves have since the 1960s never included any type of borrowing, not even discount window borrowings. If someone does not call the government out on this small data manipulation who knows what they will be inventing next and what crap we’ll be accepting next.

I analyzed the difference between total reserves and non borrowed reserves since the 1960s in excel last month but I did not bother to post the charts since I thought people would get the point. Since people have not, I will release the data and excel soon. It is important to note that I made this during the beginning of February.

I have not blogged about many things that I have followed in the market simply due to time restraints. The truth is I read and analyze a lot more than one post a day of market news. The market is way too complex to accurately analyze properly with minimal analysis, but just simple enough to meaningfully predict profitable trends. With that said, there has been a sad trend that I have followed but not really talked about because I thought it was unimportant to the market. However, this past week I was proved wrong.

Posted by rismay, filed under Federal Reserve, News, Uncategorized. Date: May 28, 2008, 12:45 pm | No Comments »

For the past two weeks, I’ve been attempting to predict which direction the market would go. As they say, trying to guess the bottom is a fools game. Although, I do have a friend which called for the bottom to come at the end of February before the Fed’s last meeting. Thus, I’m moving onto something more substantive. Why try to predict an investment vehicle, the entire market, which has hundreds of forces acting on it when you can isolate certain variables through more focused vehicles? As is clearly visible, the market has not realized what road they are headed on. Which makes sense: guessing which way it is going before the events happen is speculation. Surely, we can’t expect the qualified equity traders of the world to sell stocks on speculation the worlds strongest economy is going to enter a recession. Thus, let’s work on isolating individual variables into individual investment vehicles. After all, this has been my forte for about a year now (I’ll show the stats later). Disclosure: I’m not a CFA, don’t work in Wall Street and I’m looking to invest in some of these vehicles. At the end of the day, this is just my subprime insight.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted by rismay, filed under Uncategorized. Date: February 27, 2008, 4:02 pm | No Comments »

Today Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Hank Paulson, Secretary of the Treasury, and Chris Cox, Chairman of the SEC, met to testify to Senator Dodd.

The last time this happened was in the aftermath of 9/11. They met in a “historic” room to discuss the historic economic crisis. This is the first time since The Great Depression that we have experienced a decline in existing housing prices for two years. It is projected to continue for two years. Bernanke is warning that “significant” deterioration is possible in the housing and credit market.

We are seeing the first of the bailouts to Wall Street Freddie Mac is stepping in to buy the “frozen assets” of banks. Although it is not explicitly mentioned this is a bailout. The government is taking the loans that private investors

Here is the video. It’s a must watch.

Posted by cmonterroza, filed under Uncategorized. Date: February 14, 2008, 12:08 pm | No Comments »

Dawn Bennett discussing last week that M&A activity would surge due to cheap market valuation and the huge stocks of cash that companies have available. This is interesting considering that M&A was part of the reason for today’s debt bubble. I guess the difference here is that acquisitions this year will actually make some sort of valuation sense and probably create shareholder value.

Check out the video:

Posted by cmonterroza, filed under Uncategorized. Date: February 13, 2008, 12:04 am | No Comments »

First off, here’s a good summary of where the Economy is going by Caroline Baum:

U.S. Recession Indicators Are All Pointing South

However, her next article, personally, was rather disappointing. She dismisses those calling attention to the “Aggregate Reserves of Depository Institutions and the Monetary Base” statistic that has recently flown out of its historical level. She says their emails remind her of those sent by the, “Black Helicopter/Tin-Foil Hat” crowd. In other words, conspiracy theorists. Besides this, her article is very informative to those who don’t know about reserve requirements, basic accounting, and the TAF loans recently instated.


She saved me a lot of work: I was going to write a blog post clarifying all those things so people can understand what all this really meant.

However, a lot of assumptions have been made about what those pointing out the statistics are claiming.

The most notable one, is that people who talk about non-borrowed reserves are implying that banks are insolvent. If anyone believes that, well then, they are crazy. If you are one of them, you can actually go here and theorize about where the Fed has taken all of the United State’s gold. God speed to you, you’re doing us all a big favor.

Lets make this clear: The TAF auction along with common things like REPOs that provide liquidity to banks who have sufficient collateral. For a thorough discussion and critique of Baum’s dismissive article you can read this great post (Subscribe to the blog if you can also, his posts are must reads): Tin Foil Hats.

If your too busy to read that here’s a summary: In trying to point out the illogicalness of those with “tin foil” hats on, unfortunately the critics have put on some of their own. They claim that the Fed can simply “print out” money, as if money grew on magical trees in the Treasury’s backyard or as if the market wouldn’t reject the dollar, devalue it, if that were to happen. Unfortunately, as some have put it, the Fed is playing a complicated game. Printing money is not the solution and people are ignoring the fact that the monetary base is actually decreasing.

Now: What am I claiming? Simple: this is one of many indicators that should be looked at in tandem, not in isolation. To say that this stat is insignificant, is absurd. Any statistic that moves outside of its normal operating parameters deserves attention, especially one that indicates the financial industries level of borrowing during a time of financial stress.

Although I agree with everything Mish had to say, I liked the statistic because it shows the financial industries need for capital. If banks need cash, they will start to liquidate their assets. Depending on the urgency, different assets will be liquidated. For a discussion on that front head over to Mish’s page and learn about balance sheets.

Now, for some basic accounting: What is the most liquid asset in any company’s balance besides cash? Marketable Securities.

If banks need money desperately, chances are they will start liquidating their marketable securities. Their best performing and highly overpriced, in PE terms, marketable securities will be the first to go. What brought me into analyzing this phenomenon is the huge drop off in tech stocks, a sector which performed superbly during the whole subprime crisis, but has taken a beating since Jan 2nd (the start of the new tax year for traders). For a recap of the madness, take a look at Bloomberg’s summary. If you like pictures, here’s a nice one. In one sentence: Tech stocks are at below internet bubble crash valuations in terms of PE.

Furthermore, banks have now for the first time turned an idle liability into an expense. Sure the Fed is saving the banks money by giving them low interest rates, but banks have typically never paid interest for such large sums of reserves. The Fed is just saving the banks from borrowing at ridiculous rates as risk gets repriced on Wall Street. This is just another sign of banks raising their cost of capital. Not lowering it despite the decreasing fed funds rate. The H.3 data was just an early indicator of what is now becoming apparent in the industry. For example, here’s an article from today of Bloomberg announcing just that: Bernanke Stymied as Rate Cuts Fail to Lower Borrowing Costs.

Why does this matter to investors? Because banks are probably more worried about fixing their balance sheets right now then investing. Right now, banks are struggling to survive, not getting rich. Banks are tightening lending on every front and raising capital from where ever they can. If you don’t understand that the demand for stocks in general is as important as the fundamentals of an individual stock then you are missing half the picture. At the heart of the mater is that the stock market is a capital market. If there is a lack of capital to invest it simply won’t flourish. For evidence of this go look up Japan, a perfect example of a modern economy entering a deflationary spiral, where some stocks, not all, were trading below their companies cash reserves per share. For all the naysayers thinking, “Pssh, this isn’t Japan in 1991,” understand that what are thinking was exactly what Wall Street bet on when they came up with CDOs. Everyone cumulatively bet that existing housing prices would never decrease since it hadn’t happened since The Great Depression. For a discussion on that head over to Mish again and read, “Things that Can’t Happen.”

Posted by cmonterroza, filed under Uncategorized. Date: February 12, 2008, 11:58 pm | No Comments »

Posted by cmonterroza, filed under Uncategorized. Date: February 12, 2008, 9:59 am | 8 Comments »

 Maybe people will listen to Jim:

“So for the millionth time, I will spell it out: The easings have everything to do with crisis and nothing to do with growth. Of course they are inflationary. But the crisis has to be averted. I would also argue, unlike the people on the Fed, that we are in a “deflationary” spiral not an inflationary one, because a deflationary spiral is what happens when your most important asset, your home, declines in value.”

Source: Bloggingstocks

Read the post.  

Posted by cmonterroza, filed under Uncategorized. Date: February 10, 2008, 7:27 pm | No Comments »

The Financial Times is beginning to see the light. Watch The Financial Times talk about the markets recent activity.

The Short View

The US is not worried about inflation. It’s worried that it does not have enough tools to stave off deflation.

Posted by cmonterroza, filed under Uncategorized. Date: February 7, 2008, 7:34 am | No Comments »

« Previous Entries